Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruben Orihuela
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 14:26, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ruben Orihuela (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Ineligible for BLP PROD because of date of creation, this article is a BLP and has no references whatsoever. I tossed up between a CSD and an AFD. I chose AFD because it mirrors the BLP PROD timescale. No notability asserted. There are many Spanish rhythmic gymnasts. Is this one notable? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There are many sources for the subject, see for starters [1] [2] [3] [4], more on GNews. It seems what's notable is that there aren't many male Spanish rhythmic gymnasts, and the subject was the winner of the first two editions of the National Male Rhytmic Gymnastics Championship [5] (2009 and I guess 2010; note that Spain is the first country having a national tournament of the discipline). I'm going through the sources now and I'll be adding to the article during these days — Frankie (talk) 23:38, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw Nomination on the basis of the references added to the article. Passes WP:GNG. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:47, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.